‘What is the difference between Hinduism, Buddhism and Zoroastrianism?’ (short 300-word response)

‘Is Paganism more natural than Abrahamic monotheism?’ (short 300-word response)
‘Which religions are not patriarchal?’ (short 300-word response)
_______________________________________________

Beginning with Buddha and Hinduism would explain some differences.

Buddha rejected traditional Brahmanism (Hinduism). He disliked the varna (caste) system in which religious power and authority were held by the priests (Brahmins) stationed at the top. Brahmins exclusively performed rituals, which gave them cultural prestige. Even kings and powerful figures would consult them. They also uniquely taught the Vedas to the two classes below them, the Kshatriyas (warriors, kings), and the Vaishyas (agriculturalists, traders, and farmers). Those at the bottom, the Shudras (workers, laborers), were denied access to the Vedic teachings.

Buddha considered this discriminatory. He putatively said, “Not by birth is one an outcast; not by birth is one a Brahmin. By deed one becomes an outcast, by deed one becomes a Brahmin”. When men and women entered the sangha (Buddhist community), they left social distinctions behind.

Further, despite several shared beliefs (reincarnation, samsara, rebirth, etc.), various doctrinal differences emerged. Hindus affirmed an eternal soul (atman), which Buddha rejected. Buddha asserted that there is no subsisting self. Instead, all is in perpetual flux, including the human (who consists of five skandas, or aggregates). However, for the Hindu, there is a subsisting self, and if he successfully escapes samsara (the process of rebirth and redeath) by attaining liberation (moksha), he unites with the ineffable, impersonal ultimate reality, brahman. Buddhism does not hold this idea. Attaining liberation (nirvana) from samsara is like the extinguishment of a flame. There is no ultimate reality.

Zoroastrianism, a Persian religion that emerged c. sixth century BCE, does not affirm reincarnation and rebirth, distancing it from Hinduism and Buddhism. Early Theravada Buddhism has no concept of gods, whereas Zoroastrianism and Hinduism do. Zoroastrianism is usually distinctive in its stark dualism regarding deities. The Gathas teach that two gods (Ahura Mazda (good) and Ahriman (evil)) and their supernatural armies are in constant warfare, and that humans always take a side in this based on their actions. Here it shares similarities with Hinduism and Buddhism by affirming evil and suffering within creation. Suffering is particularly stressed in Buddha’s first Noble Truth, which is the truth of suffering (Dukkha).

2 comments

  1. So, these are all pretty standard academic descriptions of the religions.

    When you get to practice, all these differences are, well, academic.

    J C Chatterji, in the book ‘The Wisdom of the Vedas,” quotes passages from the Upanishads and ancient Pali (Buddhist) texts in which the Brahman and Nirvana are described with the exact same language.

    In fact, when you leave textual interpretation and go to direct intuitive experience, you find the so-called differences in religions tend to not go away but just become irrelevant.

    For example, Christian contemplative teacher Cynthia Bourgeault – who has quite a bit of respect for Eastern traditions – makes a big deal about how unique Christ is in presenting a loving, personal God.

    Well, you could ask over a billion devotees from ancient to present day India and you’d find descriptions of a loving, personal God not only identical to terms Christ used but completely lie line with the largest understanding of Nirvana (which, according to Nagarjuna, equals samsara) and the Brahman.

  2. The Brahmins, originating from the divine realm according to Hindu beliefs, have played a pivotal role in shaping and preserving India’s cultural and spiritual heritage. Their dedication to knowledge, rituals, and education has left an indelible mark on Indian society. While they have faced criticism and challenges related to the caste system, their enduring legacy remains a testament to their cultural significance.
    https://www.indianetzone.com/21/brahmins_indian_caste.htm

Leave a reply to donsalmon Cancel reply